Chad Walker, Ph.D.

Research - Teaching - Impact

Procedural justice in Canadian wind energy development: A comparison of community-based and technocratic siting processes


Journal article


Chad Walker, Jamie Baxter
Energy research and social science, vol. 29, 2017 May 30, pp. 160-169

View PDF
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Walker, C., & Baxter, J. (2017). Procedural justice in Canadian wind energy development: A comparison of community-based and technocratic siting processes. Energy Research and Social Science, 29, 160–169.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Walker, Chad, and Jamie Baxter. “Procedural Justice in Canadian Wind Energy Development: A Comparison of Community-Based and Technocratic Siting Processes.” Energy research and social science 29 (May 30, 2017): 160–169.


MLA   Click to copy
Walker, Chad, and Jamie Baxter. “Procedural Justice in Canadian Wind Energy Development: A Comparison of Community-Based and Technocratic Siting Processes.” Energy Research and Social Science, vol. 29, May 2017, pp. 160–69.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{chad2017a,
  title = {Procedural justice in Canadian wind energy development: A comparison of community-based and technocratic siting processes},
  year = {2017},
  month = may,
  day = {30},
  journal = {Energy research and social science},
  pages = {160-169},
  volume = {29},
  author = {Walker, Chad and Baxter, Jamie},
  month_numeric = {5}
}

 Though there is a growing literature on the value of participatory siting processes for increasing local acceptance of wind energy development, there has been much less unpacking of how residents view the siting process itself. We explore differences in the ways governments and developers enact planning and how this impacts both acceptance/support and procedural justice outcomes. This mixed methods study employed in-depth interviews (n = 54) and surveys (n = 252) with multiple stakeholder groups to understand perceptions of procedural justice across two Canadian provinces. We compared Ontario – which has built a strong base of wind energy capacity using technocratic siting procedures with Nova Scotia – which has anchored its development strategy more explicitly with a community-based program. We find stronger levels of perceived procedural justice in Nova Scotia across the majority of principles tested. In Ontario, opposition to local developments was highly conflated with a lack of procedural justice including few opportunities to take part in siting. Across both provinces however, specific aspects of planning processes – mostly related to 'the ability to affect the outcome' – were strong predictors of local approval of wind. This paper closes with a discussion of how future policy programs can more effectively engage with principles of procedural justice. 

Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in